反倾销是否成为替代关税的贸易政策——基于印度反倾销的证据  

Can Anti-dumping be the Trade Policy to Replace Tariff?

作　　者：杨仕辉[1] 谢雨池[1] 邓莹莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学经济学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《河北经贸大学学报》2011年第5期74-79,共6页Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business

基　　金：暨南大学人才项目(2008JSYJ009);暨南大学"211工程"项目(JJ211Y004);广东省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目(10ZGXM79005)

摘　　要：对印度反倾销申诉样本构成、金额进行统计分析后,发现被诉中国、中国台湾和欧盟的影响较大。实证分析发现印度反倾销申诉对被诉方出口贸易的影响不尽相同。但征收关税和实施反倾销措施都会导致被诉方涉案产品出口贸易额的减少,即均存在贸易破坏效应,比较关税与反倾销措施的影响,发现反倾销措施对印度进口贸易的限制作用均远大于关税,表明反倾销措施已经成为印度替代传统关税控制进口的贸易政策。同时,印度反倾销措施还对被诉方出口具有贸易转移效应,使被诉方出口市场丧失。After statistically analyzing the composition and import values of India＇s anti-dumping cases, it can be concluded that China, Taiwan and European Union are among the most affected named countries. The paper finds that India＇s anti- dumping actions have certain diversified impacts on named countries＇ export using empirical analysis. Both tariff and anti- dumping action will bring about a reduction on named country＇s export of involved commodities, namely the ＂trade destructing effect＂. However, comparing impacts of these two measures, the authors found that anti-dumping action has a greater effect on restricting import than tariff, which proves that anti-dumping action has become a substitution of tariff as a trade policy to restrict import. Moreover, we find that India＇s anti-dumping action also has a ＂trade diversion effect＂, leading to the loss of market shares of the named countries.

关 键 词：反倾销 关税 贸易政策 贸易破坏效应 贸易转移效应 

分 类 号：F753.0[经济管理—国际贸易]