检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]益阳市中医院,湖南益阳413000 [2]湖南省安化县清塘铺镇中心卫生院,湖南安化413500
出 处:《中国中医药咨讯》2011年第17期93-93,106,共2页
摘 要:目的:探讨电脑肛肠治疗仪与传统手术方法治疗肛裂的效果。方法:随机选取2008年6月-2010年6月在我院门诊治疗肛裂的115例患者分为两组,其中实验组58人应用电脑肛肠治疗仪治疗,对照组57人采取传统手术方法治疗,术后均坐浴,消炎处理。结果:所有患者均一次性治愈,所有患者均无肛门失禁和狭窄等并发症,两组治愈率无明显差别,但实验组相对于对照组治疗时间短,术中出血少,术后疼痛轻(P〈0.05).结论:电脑肛肠治疗仪相对于传统方法治疗肛裂治疗时间短,术中出血少,术后恢复快。适宜在门诊开展。Objective: to compare the effect of anal therapeutic apparatus and traditional operation to cure anal fissures. Method: 115 cases were randomly divided into two groups, 58 patients in experimental group is using anal therapeutic apparatus to cure anal fissures, and 57 patients in control group is using traditional operation to cure. Result: all patient are cured at one time without copracrasia or anal stricture. There are no obvious differences in cure rate between two groups, but compare to control group, experimental group has some benefits, such as: shorter operation time, less bleeding during operation and less pain after operation(P〈0.05). Conclusion: compare to traditional operation to cure anal fissures, anal therapeutic apparatus has shorter operation time, less bleeding and better recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4