检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王举位[1] 张征[1] 闫国振[1] 桂凌[1] 张会兴[1] 宋莹[1] 安宝利[2]
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院,北京100083 [2]水利部水土保持植物开发管理中心,北京100038
出 处:《生态科学》2011年第4期393-398,共6页Ecological Science
基 金:晋陕蒙砒砂岩区沙棘生态工程(水规划[1998]111号)
摘 要:采用专家咨询、频度分析等方法构建了包含保育土壤、涵养水源、防风固沙等8个方面涵盖29个指标的沙棘生态服务功能评价指标体系,通过参考相关标准、参照其他植被类型的生态服务功能特征参数以及利用经验公式计算等方式进行指标体系分级,应用AHP-模糊综合评价模型对达拉特旗沙棘生态服务功能进行了综合评价。结果表明,目前达拉特旗沙棘总体生态服务功能为Ⅲ级,其中防风固沙服务功能水平为Ⅱ级,而生物多样性和景观游憩服务功能仅为Ⅳ级水平。研究发现,AHP-模糊综合评价法足适合沙棘生态服务功能评价的可行方法,具有一定的推广价值及应用性。The evaluation index system of seabuckthorn ecosystem services in the soft rock region was constructed by expert advices, frequency analysis and so on. We summarized eight main kinds of evaluation systems which covered 29 indexes, and conducted the indexes classification referring to relevant standards, other vegetation characteristic parameters of ecosystem services, empirical formulas and other methods. Besides, we comprehensively evaluated the ecosystem services of seabuckthom in the Dalad Banner using analytic hierarchy processing method (AHP)-fuzzy model. The results showed that the overall level of ecosystem services of seabuckthorn was in grade Ⅲ. The level of ecosystem services of sand-fixing was in grade Ⅱ, but the levels of biodiversity and landscape services were both in grade IV. Our results indicate that the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is practicable and feasible in studying ecosystem services of seabuekthom, and it can be widely applied in practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222