论贸易救济法上的“同类产品”和“直接竞争产品”  

On Like and Directly Competitive Products Defined by the Law of Trade Relief

作　　者：熊丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州215021

出　　处：《江苏海洋大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2011年第12期37-39,共3页Journal of Jiangsu Ocean University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition）

摘　　要：在中美轮胎特保案中,双方争论的焦点之一就是对"直接竞争产品"的认定难以达成一致意见,正如国际社会对"同类产品"的界定一样。"同类产品"和"直接竞争产品"是合理认定贸易救济措施和损害的前提,这里总结了几种实际可行的认定标准,围绕对贸易保护方式的合理界定,促进世界贸易的公平发展提出了几点看法。In Sino-UG Tire Tariff Case, the disputes focus on the identification of ＂directly competitive products＂, as in the international trade. ＂Like and directly competitive products＂ are the basis of reasonable identification of trade remedy measures and injures. Practical criteria for such identification are concluded in this paper, and discussions are carried out concerning the definition of trade protection and equality.

关 键 词：轮胎特保案 贸易救济措施 同类产品 直接竞争产品 认定 

分 类 号：DF961[政治法律—国际法学]