日耳曼法上的要物合同制度及其现代启示  

Real Contract in Germanic Law and its Modern Inspiration

作　　者：蒋军洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期93-96,共4页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目(2009BS024)

摘　　要：日耳曼法上的某些合同被冠以要物合同的名号。除了法律结构上的一致性,此种要物合同与罗马法上的要物合同有很大不同。此种合同类型所传递出的讯息有二:从本体论的视角看,在探讨要物合同的存废问题时须搞清楚到底什么是要物合同;从非本体论的视角看,在探讨要物合同的存废问题时须考察要物合同是否还有其生存基础。Some contracts in Germanic law are called real contracts.Besides the same legal constituent constructure,there are differences between real contracts in Germanic law and Roman law.As far as reservation or annulations of real contracts is concerned,there are two main points inspired from such contracts in Germanic Law.In the perspective of ontology,it is necessary to grasp the essence of real contracts.In the perspective of non-ontology,it is necessary to inspect whether there is the existing foundation of real contracts in modern society or not

关 键 词：日耳曼法 要物合同 现实合同 

分 类 号：D904[政治法律—法学理论]