检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李中[1] 黄承胜[1] 徐敏[1] 尹莉[1] 刘婷[1] 张庆[2]
机构地区:[1]湖北省荆州市第二人民医院肾内科,434000 [2]长江大学临床医学院消化内科,湖北荆州434000
出 处:《中国医师进修杂志》2011年第25期10-13,共4页Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨高通量血液透析对维持性血液透析患者体液免疫及细胞免疫功能的影响。方法选择维持性血液透析患者60例,按随机数字表法分为常规透析组(c组)和高通量血液透析组(T组),每组30例,治疗时间为12周,另选择20例健康成年体检者作为对照组(N组),监测治疗前后患者外周血免疫球蛋白、补体C1、C4以及T细胞亚群的变化,同时观察患者治疗前后感染例次的变化。结果C组患者治疗后外周血免疫球蛋白、补体C3、C4以及T细胞亚群水平较治疗前无明显变化,而T组患者治疗后外周血IgG、IgA、IgM、C3、C4、CD3+.CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平较治疗前明显升高[(12.20±3.98)g/L比(6.18±1.45)g/L,(1.89±0.58)g/L比(0.63±0.15)g/L,(1.29±0.47)g/L比(0.51±0.13)g/L,(0.94±0.36)g,L比(0.58±0.20)g/L,(0.28±0.06)g/L比(0.11±0.04)g/L,(63.11±9.43)%比(53.26±9.08)%,(38.21±6.15)%比(31.56±6.02)%,1.48±0.37比1.25±0.43](P值均〈0.05),且与C组患者治疗后比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。T组患者治疗后感染例次较治疗前明显降低[46.7%(14/30)比133.3%(40/30),P〈0.05],而C组患者治疗后感染例次较治疗前无明显变化[126.7%(38/30)比136.7%(41/30),P〉0.05]。结论高通量血液透析可以改善维持性血液透析患者的细胞免疫及体液免疫功能,降低感染率。Objective To study the changes of serum immune state in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with high-flux hemodialysis. Methods Sixty MHD patients were divided into high-flux hemodialysis group (group T, 30 cases, receiving high-flux hemodialysis, 3 times per week and routine drug therapy) and conventional dialysis group (group C, 30 cases, taking conventional dialysis, 3 times per week and routine drug therapy) by random number table. They were treated for 12 weeks. Serum IgG,IgA, IgM, C3, C4, T lymphocyte subsets and albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin were detected at the experiment onset and 12 weeks later, and compared with those of 20 normal medical examination adults (group N), meanwhile the ratio of infection was calculated. Results The levels of IgG,IgA,IgM,C3,C4,CD3+,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+ in group C had no significant changes before and after treatment (P 〉 0.05), but there were significant changes in group T[ ( 12.20 ± 3.98 ) g/L vs. (6.18 ± 1.45 ) g/L, ( 1.89 ± 0.58 ) g/L vs. (0.63 ± 0.15 ) g/L, ( 1.29 ± 0.47 ) g/L vs. (0.51 ±0.13) g/L, (0.94± 0.36) g/L vs.(0.58 ±0.20) g/L, (0.28 ±0.06) g/L vs. (0.11 ±0.04) g/L, (63.11 ± 9.43 )% vs. (53.26 ± 9.08 )%, (38.21 ± 6.15 )% vs. (31.56± 6.02 )%, 1.48 ± 0.37 vs. 1.25 ±0.43 ] (P 〈 0.05 ), and there were significant differences between group T and group C after treatment (P 〈 0.05 ). The ratio of infection in group T was decreased obviously [ 46.7% ( 14/30 ) vs. 133.3% (40/30), P 〈 0.05 ], but there was no significant difference in group C [ 126.7%(38/30) vs. 136.7%(41/30),P〉 0.05 ]. Conclusion High-flux hemodialysis can improve the immune state and the nutritional state in MHD patients, and it could decrease the infection rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3