中日钓鱼岛争端解决方法探析  

Analysis of Solutions to Sino-Japan Territorial Dispute over Diaoyu Islands

作　　者：王秀英[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学国际法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期29-34,共6页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"国际海洋法在解决中日海洋权益争议中的应用研究"(06XFX017)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：依据国际法解决彼此争端是中日双方应该履行的国际义务。从理论上而言,中日钓鱼岛争端符合《联合国宪章》规定的使用武力的例外情况,但鉴于中日两国的具体情况,通过武力方法解决钓鱼岛争端可行但不可取,而采用法律方法虽可取但不可行,相比之下,采用政治或外交方法既可行亦可取。中日双方应在充分协商的基础上,借鉴有关国家将岛屿争端与海洋划界争端分别处理的方法,妥善解决钓鱼岛领土主权争端。Both Chinese and Japanese governments are liable to solve their disputes under the international law. Theoretically speaking, the dispute between China and Japan over Diaoyu Islands is included in Article 51 of UNCharter that permits member countries to use forces. The fact, however, is just the other way round. Due to the realistic situations, neither using forces nor resorting to international jurisdictional organs is suitable for two countries to solve their dispute. The only solution that benefits both is to solve the dispute through political or diplomatic ways.

关 键 词：钓鱼岛争端 武力方法 法律方法 政治或外交方法 

分 类 号：D815.3[政治法律—国际关系]