从权力导向到规则导向:中美知识产权争端解决机制的演进  

From Power-oriented to Rule-oriented:Evolution of Sino-US IPR Disputes Settlement Mechanism

作　　者：沈鑫[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第4期69-77,162,共9页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<经济全球化与中国电子商务法律研究>(批准号:07BFX079)

摘　　要：自20世纪90年代以来,中美围绕知识产权保护及市场准入问题曾多次发生激烈双边冲突,对中国知识产权制度建立和双边关系都产生过深远影响。此后,中美经贸关系的发展和中国加入WTO,使美国以特别301条款为主导的对华知识产权政策变得难以为继。通过深入剖析美国对华知识产权政策演变的原因及动力,认为正是由于中美经贸关系迅速发展和中国知识产权制度的逐步完善,最终使得两国知识产权争端解决机制经历了由特别301条款主导的"权力导向型"逐渐向WTO/TRIPS所确立的"规则导向型"的演进过程。Since the 90s of 20th century,there were a great number of sharp bilateral conflicts on the intellectual property protection and the issues surrounding market access between China and US,which had far-reaching consequences for the establishment of the intellectual property system in China and the bilateral relations between China and US.Since then,owing to the development of China-US trade relations and China's accession to the WTO,the United States' policy on intellectual property('IP') toward China that 'Special 301' dominated has become unsustainable.Through further analysis on the reasons and motivation of the changes in the United States' intellectual property policies towards China,we conclued that it is the rapid development of China-US trade relations and the gradual improvement of the intellectual property system in China which made the dispute settlement mechanism for intellectual property disputes between China and US experience the process of the evolution from 'Power-oriented' which domoniated by 'Special 301' to 'Rule-oriented' which was established by the WTO/TRIPS.

关 键 词：权力导向 规则导向 中美知识产权 争端解决机制 

分 类 号：DF961[政治法律—国际法学]