检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚凡保[1] 谢春松[1] 王小莹[1] 邓娟芬[1]
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2011年第17期2156-2158,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探讨咪达唑仑与异丙酚在胃镜检查中的安全性、有效性。方法选取在我科行无痛胃镜检查患者234例,其中A组123例,B组111例,检查前分别静脉注射咪达唑仑0.02~0.03mg·kg。与异丙酚1.2mg·kg^-1后行胃镜检查,并与常规组120例对照。结果A组的起效时间、苏醒时间为(2.5±1.6)mim、(10.8±2.1)mim;B组为(1.8±1.2)mim、(8.7±2.6)mim;检查中A组出现恶心、躁动、呛咳呼吸抑制的发生率为8.13%、25.20%、2.44%、0,B组为0、4.50%、O%、2.70%,比C组的85.00%、47.50%、24.16%、0明显减少(P〈0.05);A、B组检查前、后SBP、DBP、HR、SPO2比较没有明显差异(P〉0.05),B组检查中与检查前比较SBP、DBP、HR下降较A组明显(P〈0.05),而SPO2则无明显变化(P〉0.05)。结论异丙酚无痛作用效果好,起效及苏醒时间短;眯达唑仑注药简单,无明显呼吸循环系统变化。两者在胃镜检查中安全、有效,不良反应较常规组明显减少,各单位可根据自身不同条件分别选用。Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of midazolam and propofol in gastroscopy. Methods 234 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were divided into group A ( 123 patients ) and group B ( 111 patients ). Group A received intravenous midazolam of 0.02 - 0.03mg· kg-1 and group B received propofol of 1.2mg ·kg-1 prior to endoscopy examination. 120 control subjects were group C. Results The onset time was ( 2.5± 1.6 ) mim in group A and ( 1.8 ± 1.2 ) mim in group B; and the awakening time was( 10.2 ± 2.1 ) mim in group A and ( 8.7 ± 2.6 )mim in group B. Rates of nausea, agitation, and dry cough were 8.13%, 25.20%, and 2.44% in group A and 0%, 4.50%, 0%, and 2.70% in group B, which were markedly lower than those in group C ( 85.00%, 47.50%, and 24.16%, respectively; P〈 0.05 ) SBP, DBP, HR, and SPO2 did not differ significantly in groups A and B after the procedure ( P 〉 0.05 ). SBP, DBP, and HR, as compared with their baselines, decreased more significantly in group B than in group A ( P〈 0.05 ) during the procedure, while SPO2did not change significantly ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions Propofol has a better analgetic effect and shorter onset and awakening time; midazolam is simple in use and causes no significant changes in respiratory and circulatory systems. Either propofol or midazolam is safe and effective in gastroscopy and has fewer adverse reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145