共链与共引聚类的实证对比研究  被引量:4

An Empirical Comparison Research of Co-link and Co-citation Clusters

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:卞志昕[1] 

机构地区:[1]上海图书馆上海科学技术情报研究所,上海200031

出  处:《情报杂志》2011年第9期40-44,共5页Journal of Intelligence

摘  要:网络计量学中的共链分析是一种新兴方法,也被认为是文献计量学中共引分析在网络文献的延伸。为了考察两者的实际关系,对专利技术公司和学术机构分别进行共链分析,将得到的多维尺度分析聚类图分别与专利共引和论文共引聚类图比较,得出共链分析与共引分析两种方法的相似性与差异性。同时发现,结合专利、论文、网页内容的共引与共链组合方法能够全方位地反映行业的情况,可以作为行业情报研究的有效方法之一。Being an emerging method,the co-link analysis of webometrics is also thought to be the extension of co-citation of bibliometrics on the web.To explore the relationship between co-link and co-citation,the patent corporations and academic institutions are analyzed using co-link method separately.The results(MDS clusters) are compared to patent co-citation clusters and academic paper co-citation clusters,so the similarities and differences of them are summarized.Meanwhile,it is also found that the combination of co-citation and co-link with patent,academic paper and internet webpage can reflect the industry's whole profile,it can be one of the useful methods for industry CI research.

关 键 词:共链分析 共引分析 网络计量学 专利 学术论文 

分 类 号:G353[文化科学—情报学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象