律师伪证罪的追诉程序探析  

Research on the Prosecution Procedure of the Lawyer' s Perjury

作　　者：毛立新[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第10期35-40,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：刑法第306条规定的"律师伪证罪",往往成为侦控机关对律师实施职业报复的工具。究其原因,不惟在于实体法之不完善,更在于缺乏正当法律程序的保障。借鉴法治先进国家的经验,有必要在我国刑事诉讼法中增设集体回避及管辖异议制度、排除辩护人程序、追究律师刑事责任的前置程序、对律师采取强制侦查措施的特殊保障等,以保障律师免受非法或不当的刑事追诉,维护其合法执业权利。Article 306 of criminal law is often used as a tool by the prosecuting party to implement the occupational retaliation against defenders. To find out its cause, the main risks not only originate from the faultiness of the criminal law, but also lie in the lack of due process. We can use for reference the successful experience of other countries and add some special regulations in our criminal procedural law as follows ： the collective avoidance system and the jurisdictional dispute system, the special procedure of excluding the defender from the lawsuit,the prior procedure of starting a prosecution againsit defender,the special protection procedure of taking criminal coercive measures. These can protect the defenders against the illegal or improper prosecution and safeguard their operation rights.

关 键 词：律师伪证罪 刑事追诉 正当程序 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]