涉及电子代理的侵财案件刑事责任研究  

Study on Criminal Responsibility of Property Violation by Electronic Agent

作　　者：王丹霞[1] 张继红[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北工业大学,天津300401

出　　处：《信息网络安全》2011年第9期149-151,158,共4页Netinfo Security

基　　金：河北省高等学校社科研究2009年度基金项目(Sz090103)

摘　　要：对于涉及电子代理的非接触类犯罪案件的刑事定性,理论和实践领域都存在颇多争议。为了厘清此类案件刑事责任,不枉不纵,有效打击犯罪,分别就电子代理正常运行和错误运行状态下对于行为人刑事责任影响进行了相应分析。以正常运行电子代理为工具的侵财犯罪因涉及到对电子代理支配者的欺诈,应认定为诈骗类犯罪;电子代理错误运行下行为人的侵财行为不构成一般观点中的盗窃罪、诈骗罪、侵占罪,而该行为确实具有较大的社会危害性,依据现行立法不能定罪,所以应修改立法,设立专门的罪名来追究此类行为的刑责。There＇re many disputes in field of theory and practice on the conviction of untouchable criminal cases concerned electronic agents. So the cirminal ability of such cases should be clarifed in order to fight against such crime. And respective anysises of the influnce to ciminal abilities should be maken when the electronic agents work normally or abnormally. The crime of property violation by normal electronic agents is a deceit to the victim, so which commits the crime of fraud. The property violation by abnormal electronic agents doesn＇t commit the crime of theft, fraud or embezzlement. And it cann＇t be convicted under the existing legislation, but which is of serious social harmfulness, so the legislation should be amended and establish a new crime to punish such act.

关 键 词：电子代理 侵财犯罪 电子错误 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]