梁启超、胡适、郭沫若史学特点之比较及其学术关联  

A Comparison of History-research Characteristics between Liang Qichao,Hu Shi and Guo Moruo and Their Academic Relations

作　　者：周文玖[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院史学理论与史学史研究中心,北京100875

出　　处：《史学史研究》2011年第3期53-64,共12页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"民国时期史学之研究"(项目号:10JJD770005)阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文认为,梁启超、胡适、郭沫若是中国史学近代转型进程中最有代表性的史家。他们先后引领了三大史学思潮,体现了史学近代转型的阶段性进步。他们都以"但开风气不为师"为旨趣,在多个学术领域尽显才华,是"球形的发展"式的天才学者。他们之间还有学术关联,彼此之间存在不少学术争论,又反映出其治史特点的差异。胡适、郭沫若均受到梁启超的影响。梁、胡有直接的学术交往,梁、郭则没有。胡、郭的学术交往反复曲折,学术论争中夹杂着政治和个人义气的因素。文章最后对近年来贬损郭沫若史学地位的倾向作了辨析。Liang Qichao, Hu Shi and Guo Moruo were most representative historians during the course of Chinese historiography modernization. They led three historical trends successively, marking three developing stages in Chinese modern historiography. Having ＂only create new academic atmosphere but not act as master＂ as their common academic interest and objective, they made great contributions to several different fields. Despite close academic links between one another, they also had quite some debates, indicating their different academic styles and showing complicated relations between them.

关 键 词：梁启超 胡适 郭沫若 学术关联 比较 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]