检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》2011年第9期846-849,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨双能CT虚拟平扫技术鉴别孤立性肺结节(SPN)良恶性的准确性及辐射剂量。方法61例SPN患者,其中经病理证实恶性39例,良性18例。经对比增强双能CT扫描,使用LiverVNC处理程序测量虚拟平扫图像和增强图像中SPN的CT值,同时获得两者差值。将CT值差值/〉20HU的SPN确定为恶性,计算诊断准确性。使用配对t检验对其中28例患者的常规CT平扫和虚拟平扫图像的噪声进行评价(1~5)分,使用Mann—WhitneyU检验对图像质量及每例患者的辐射剂量进行评价。结果使用虚拟平扫图像为基线进行SPN良、恶性判断的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为89.7%(35/39)、72.2%(13/18)、84.2%(48/57)。常规平扫图像和虚拟平扫图像的噪声分别为(8.49±1.94)、(10.14±2.18)HU,t=9.45,P〈0.01;图像质量评分分别为(4.71±0.46)、(4.42±0.57)分,U=290.00,P〉0.05。单次常规平扫和双能CT扫描患者接受辐射的有效剂量分别为(3.72±0.48)、(3.78±0.45)mSv,U=350.50,P〉0.05。结论双能CT胸部扫描可有效降低对患者的放射性辐射;以虚拟平扫图像为基线判断SPN的良恶性具有较高的准确性。Objective To determine the accuracy and radiation dose of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) by virtual non-enhanced images. Methods Sixty-one patients with SPNs including 39 malignant and 18 benign nodules proved by pathology underwent DECT scans. The CT values of SPNs on enhanced weighted average and virtual non-enhanced images were compared by using Liver VNC processing unit in terms of their diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing malignant and benign nodules with a 20 HU threshold. Diagnostic accuracy was compared. In 28 patients of all patients, image noise and quality score of the non-enhanced and virtual non-enhanced images were compared, and radiation doses of each patient were recorded. The paired t test was used to analyze the noise difference between the plain scan and virtual non-enhanced scan. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze statistically significant differences of the image quality score and radiation dose between the non-enhanced scan and virtual non-enhanced scan. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for distinguishing benign and malignant nodules by using the virtual non-enhanced image of were 89.7% (35/39), 72. 2% ( 13/18 ), 84. 2% (48/57) respectively. The noise of common CT and virtual nonenhanced images were (8.49 ± 1.94 ) HU and (10. 14 ± 2. 18 ) HU, and there were statistically difference (t =9.45,P 〈0. 01 ). The quality scores of common CT and virtual non-enhanced images were (4. 71 ±0.46) and (4. 42 ±0. 57 ), and there were no statistical difference ( U = 290.00, P 〉 0. 05 ). The radiation doses of common CT and DECT were ( 3.72 ± 0. 48 ) rosy and ( 3.78 ± 0.45 ) mSv, and there were no statistical difference ( U = 350. 50,P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion DECT by using virtual non-enhanced images is useful tool to distinguish the benign and malignant SPN without additional radiation dose.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38