四部分类法之起源再辨  

Another Debate and Analysis of the Origin of the Classification of the Four Branches

作　　者：唐明元[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川理工学院图书馆,四川自贡643000

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第5期121-125,共5页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：从《隋书·经籍志》相关史料的断句、荀勖新簿与郑默《中经》之关系、《北堂书钞》所引两处史料的正确解读、荀勖开创四部分类法的主观与客观条件、古今书目不录《中经》之原因等六个方面,就四部分类法的起源问题与董恩林先生《郑默〈中经〉首创四部分类法考辨》一文进行深入的讨论,进而认为荀勖新簿是一部承袭《中经》所著录图书、又变更了《中经》分类体制的一部全新的目录著作,因此,四部分类法只能是起源于荀勖《晋中经簿》、而非郑默之《中经》。Through analyzing deeply Mr. Dong Enlin＇s article about the origin of the Classification of the Four Branches and related historical materials, this paper carries out an in-depth discussion on the Classification of the Four Branches with Mr. Dong Enlin from six aspects, i.e. the relationship between Xun Xu＇s Jin Zhong Jing Bu and Zheng Mo＇s Zhong Jing;, the reason why Zhong Jing has not been recorded by all the Catalog books, etc. The paper puts for- ward that Xun Xu＇s Jin Zhong Jing Bu is a new book that inherited the books recorded by Zheng Mo＇s Zhong Jing and changed the Classification system of Zhong Jing. Therefore, the Classification of the Four Branches can only be derived from Xun Xu＇s Jin Zhong .ling Bu rather than Zheng Mo＇s Zhong Jing.

关 键 词：四部分类法 起源 《中经》 《晋中经簿》 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]