检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北大学药学院,保定市071000 [2]河北保定市药品检验所,保定市071000
出 处:《中国药房》2011年第37期3551-3552,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较半开放式静脉输液器2种排气方式对药液中不溶性微粒污染的影响情况。方法:模拟临床输液操作,分别采用上、下部排气方式对半开放式静脉输液器进行排气,同时对药液中不溶性微粒进行检测。结果:经检测,≥10μm的不溶性微粒,上、下部排气方式结果分别为(3.11±0.82)、(4.21±0.87)个/mL,t值为3.985,P=0.000;≥25μm的不溶性微粒,上、下部排气方式结果分别为(0.19±0.90)、(0.36±0.10)个/mL,t值为2.374,P=0.000。2种排气方式比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:半开放式静脉输液器采用上部排气方式对减少药液不溶性微粒方面优于下部排气方式。OBJECTIVE: To compare the insoluble particles of liquid medicine resulted from 2 kinds of exhaust methods of semi-open intravenous infusion apparatus. METHODS: In this research, up exhaust method and low exhaust method were separately used on semi-open intravenous infusion apparatus, and insoluble particles of liquid medicine were detected. RESULTS: The fig- ures for insoluble particles which were ≥10μm were (4.21 ± 0.87) particals/mL by low exhaust method and (3.11 ± 0.82) particals/ mL by up exhaust method (t=3.985, P=0.000). The figures for insoluble particles which were ≥25 μm were (0.36 ± 0.10) particals/mL by low exhaust method and (0.19 ± 0.90) particals/mL by up exhaust method (t=2.374, P=0.000). There was significant difference between them (P〈0.01). CONCLUSION: Up exhaust method is better than low exhaust method in reduction of insoluble particles in liquid medicine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249