检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第478医院麻醉科,昆明市650200
出 处:《临床合理用药杂志》2011年第11期37-38,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
摘 要:目的观察腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产术中的临床疗效及安全性。方法将100例拟行剖宫产术的健康产妇随机分为腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)组和硬膜外(CEA)组,各50例。CEA组单纯硬膜外注入2%利多卡因,CSEA组蛛网膜下腔注入0.5%布比卡因2.5ml。观察2组麻醉起效时间、镇痛和肌松效果、新生儿评分情况以及不良反应。结果 CSEA组麻醉起效快,镇痛和肌松效果好,与CEA组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组新生儿评分及术中低血压、术后头痛等不良反应发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腰硬联合麻醉起效迅速,具有良好的镇痛和肌松作用,用于剖宫产术有良好的临床应用前景。Objective To observe the clinical effect and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in cesarean section.Methods 100 cases of patients were randomly divided into combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) group and combined epidural anesthesia(CEA) group,each of 50 cases.CEA group received 2% lidocaine at epidural space only,CSEA group received 0.5% bupivacaine 2.5ml.Observed anesthesia onset time,analgesic and muscle relaxation effect,neonatal score situation and adverse reactions of 2 groups.Results Patients of CSEA group,rapid onset of anesthesia fast,analgesia and muscle relaxation effect nice,compared with CEA group,the difference were statistically significant(P〈0.05);Neonatal score and intraoperative hypotension,postoperative headache incidence of adverse reactions of 2 group were no significant difference(P〈0.05).Conclusion CSEA for cesarean section is safety and effective anesthesia,which is rapid effect and with good analgesia and muscle relaxation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.82.179