检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵永春[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学文学院历史系,教授博士生导师长春130012
出 处:《广西民族研究》2011年第3期17-26,共10页GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重点研究项目"20世纪中国古代史领域的重要理论观点研究"的阶段性成果;项目批准号:2009JJD70009
摘 要:上世纪80年代以前,学术界在有关民族关系主流问题的讨论中,主要提出了"友好合作"或"互相打仗"是民族关系主流的两种不同的观点。1981年,白寿彝和翁独健等人提出"各民族共同推动历史前进"是民族关系主流的新观点以后,有人赞成,有人反对。产生歧义的主要原因是由于学者们对民族关系"主流"的概念理解不同所致。笔者认为,如果按照民族关系主要包括战争与和平两大方面来分辨主流和非主流的话,"和平相处"无疑是民族关系的主流。Before the 1980s there were mainly two different viewpoints of "friendly cooperation" and "mutual war" proposed in the academic discussion on the mainstream of nation relations. In 1981, Bai Shouyi and Weng Dujian etc. argued that the mainstream of nation relations was " History improvement promoted jointly by all nations" . This new point of view received both agreement and disagreement. The controversy results from the fact that scholars have differently apprehended the concept of " the mainstream of nation relations" . In the opinion of the author, if we distinguish the mainstream and non- mainstream according to that nation relations are mainly including "war" and " peace", " peaceful coexistence" will be Viewed as the mainstream of nation relations undoubtedly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15