对民事法律关系“一元客体说”的反思--兼论我国民事法律关系客体类型的应然选择  

An Argument over"Monistic Object"Doctrine of Relations Regulated by Civil Legislation:On China’s Appropriate Choice

作　　者：郑晓剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《现代法学》2011年第4期59-67,共9页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：民事法律关系"一元客体说"主张在民法典中构建一元化的民事权利客体类型,但是这种观点在理论上和逻辑上均不能成立。"一元客体之利益说"混淆了民事权利的客体与民事权利的本质和内容之间的区别,混淆了民事权利的客体与民事权利的法律保护目的之间的界限;"一元客体之行为说"在逻辑上并不周延,不能在绝对权法律关系中清晰地界定客体的存在与性质。建立多元、开放的民事法律关系客体体系是中国民法典的应然选择。The＂monistic object＂doctrine concerning the relations regulated by civil legislation advocates that in the civil code only the monistic relation regulated by civil legislation should be assumed,which,however,cannot be justified either in logic or in practice.The＂interest-centered monistic object＂doctrine ignore the difference between the object of civil rights and the purpose of protection of civil rights while the abstract object that centers on behaviors also fails to distinctively demark the existence and mature of the object in the civil law relations of absolute rights. Therefore, an open and plural objects system of civil right may be the proper choice for China’s Civil Code.

关 键 词：客体 民事法律关系 民法典 民事权利 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]