检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]赤峰学院附属医院耳鼻咽喉科,赤峰021000 [2]大学附属医院耳鼻咽喉一头颈外科
出 处:《听力学及言语疾病杂志》2011年第5期419-421,共3页Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
基 金:国家自然科学基金委员会资助项目(30973296)
摘 要:目的通过客观声学分析了解喉全切除术后食管音助发声器发音的发音质量。方法应用上海泰亿格公司的Dr.speed嗓音声学分析软件对7例食管音助发声器发音的患者(食管音助发声器发音组)及5例气管食管音患者(气管食管音组)的基频、基频微扰、振幅微扰、谐噪比、声强及最大发声时间进行检测,并与12名正常男性(对照组)进行比较。结果食管音助发声器发音组、气管食管音组的基频、基频微扰、振幅微扰、谐噪比,最大发声时间与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01),三组间声强比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),食管音助发声器发音组最大发声时间比气管食管音组长(P<0.05),其余指标与气管食管音组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论食管音助发声器发音的声音的声强可达77.40 dB、最大发声时间可达10.77秒,基本能够满足日常交流的需要。Objective To objectively evaluate the acoustic quality of esophageal voice after total laryngectomy by speech aid appliance. Methods Twelve volunteers were included as traeheoesophageal pronunciation group; a total of 7 cases were included as group of oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance,and 12 cases of normal male were used as control group. Results Patients with oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance, fundamental frequency,jitter, shimmer and signal--to--noise ratio, the maximal phonation time and intensity of the vowel/a/ were measured. The acoustics ampling in oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance group and in traeheo--oesophageal speech group were lower than that of in nomal voice group, there were statistical significance(P〈0.05 or P〈0.01 ). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion The oesophageal voice by speech aid appliance was more fluent,providirg the basic commnunication needs for the patients.
分 类 号:R767.92[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222