检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省厦门大学附属第一医院内分泌科,361003
出 处:《中国实用医药》2011年第24期230-232,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨两种不同糖尿病健康教育模式在糖尿病患者中的应用及效果。方法将136例糖尿病患者随机分为观察组和对照组各68例,观察组由通过统一培训后的糖尿病专科护士采用看图对话互动式健康教育方式,对照组采用传统式教育方式,通过问卷调查,比较教育前及教育1年后两组糖尿病患者的糖尿病知识掌握程度及自护行为的变化。结果两组糖尿病患者教育前糖尿病知识测评及自护行为量表评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),教育后观察组患者对糖尿病知识的掌握程度、自律运动、饮食控制、血糖监测率均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论与传统的以医疗为中心的被动式教育模式相比,以患者为中心的看图对话互动式教育模式,能使患者主动参与决策过程,提高了患者对糖尿病知识的掌握程度及治疗依从性,改善其自护行为,提高了患者的生活质量,因此有必要在糖尿患者群中进行推广。Objective To investigate the two different health education models of diabetes in patients with diabetes in the application and effect. Methods 136 cases of diabetes were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in study group received interactive education with conversation map, patients in the control group using traditional educational methods. The diabetic Knowledge and self-care behaviors were measured and compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results The diabetic Knowledge and self- care behaviors were not difference in diabetic patient of two groups before education ( P 〉 0. 05 ). After nuring intervention, the the mastery of knowledge, self-movement, diet, blood glucose monitoring rates in patients were significantly better than the control group (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The interactive education with conversation map enable patients to actively participate in decision-making process, improve patient knowledge levels of diabetes and treatment compliance, improve their self-care behavior, improve the patient's quality of life. It is therefore necessary to promote in the diabetic population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.0.207