检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包兴[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学工商管理学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《管理工程学报》2011年第3期37-42,共6页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(10YJC630004);国家自然科学基金资助项目(70732003;70902072;90924004)
摘 要:分析了生产运作系统能力的应急管理模式,围绕应急期间系统内部能力恢复和外部能力采购以及管理者风险态度的影响,以应急总成本最小为目标构建了能力应急管理模型,并对该多阶段应急模型进行数值分析后得到4个重要的应急管理结论,对管理者制定科学的应急决策均具有重要的指导意义。In the recent decades,many external factors(e.g.natural disasters,terrorist attacks,and political turmoil) have constantly disrupted the normal operations of some large-scaled systems,such as power grids,communication stations and chemical plants.The system disruption can cause great losses to a society and its economy.The management begins paying attention to hedging risks of system disruptions.Current literature underestimates the potential influence of a decision maker's risk attitude(e.g.risk-netural,conservative or aggressive) on risk management.To provide a reasonable model to manage risks associated with the capacity disruption,we add the risk attitude of decision makers to a mathematical model. In the year of 2008,a great freezingA heavy rain hit the southern China in 2008 and,which caused the a wide-ranged collapse of power grids.When managing the disruption,we found that damaged systems need to face two important issues.First,During the disruption management,we found two interesting restricts that capacity-injured systems have to face: first,the recovery of critical capacity is a cost-expensive and multi-periods process,due to the technique of maintenance department and provision of spare parts. Second,capacity-sharing partners could support parts of capacity that is usually much cheaper than recovery;however,the sharing of capacity has limited quantity and uncertain provision.Based on these findings,a α factor is firstly constructed to map the inventory and capacity-shortage into a decision-maker's risk attitude.Second,we proposed a single-period capacity disruption management model and then extended it to a multi-period model that has a proven unique solution sequence.Finally,we present a sensitive analysis towards key parameters by using the Genetic Algorithm. A comparison is presented with the research of ,we find 4Four interesting managerial insights were discovered.First,aggressive or conservative of decision-maker's risk attitude of decision makers s merely have has no influence
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.41.2