论刑事诉讼的证人范围:以《刑法》第306条为例  

The Scope of Testifiers in Criminal Procedure: Taking the Article 306 in the Criminal Law of the P.R.C. as an Example

作　　者：王永杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海201620

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2011年第4期53-61,共9页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：2010年教育部一般项目"辩护人伪证罪相关问题研究"(10YJA820108)

摘　　要：无论从理论上还是从立法实践上来看,单位均不具备证人资格。然而,同案被告人、生理及精神上有缺陷和年幼的人、警察、鉴定人以及见证人,由于其具有同证人作证相同的本质特征,如果将其排除在律师伪证罪的对象范围之外,显然与刑法平等性的实质内涵相违背。因此,律师通过威胁、引诱等手段获得违背事实的证言,在符合律师伪证罪其他构成要件的前提下,应当受到刑事追诉。a work unit is not qualified to be a testifier both in legislative theory and practice. However, the co-accused, the physically and spiritually handicapped, the under-aged, policemen, appraisers and eyewitnesses share similarities with testifiers in same essential characteristics, therefore it is against the equality of criminal law to exclude them from the scope of the objects of lawyer＇ s perjury. Hence a lawyer shall be accused of lawyer＇ s perjury when he is proved to threaten or seduce the testifiers to get testimonies against truth.

关 键 词：律师伪证罪 证人 范围 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]