检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵敏[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏警官学院,江苏南京210031
出 处:《妇女研究论丛》2011年第5期11-18,共8页Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
基 金:江苏省教育厅"青蓝工程";江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(项目批准号09SJB820009);江苏警官学院科研基金项目(批准号08Y027)资助
摘 要:婚姻身份协议正以越来越丰富的形态出现,中国民事立法尚未对其效力作出明确规定,司法实践对其效力认定不一。婚姻身份协议不同于一般的民事契约,它是饱受家庭暴力、婚外情等行为困扰的女性自我保护的一种救济手段。但建立在性别不平等基础的婚姻身份协议必然存在着难以解决的现实问题,因此这些受侵害女性的权益保障命题绝不仅仅通过婚姻身份协议就能够完成,它需要国家公共政策主要是法律作出相应的制度安排。Marital status agreements have emerged increasingly in varying forms while China's civil legislation has not made explicit provisions on the efficacy of these agreements and judicial practices have shown the provision of diverse definitions. Marital status a- greements, as a means of women's salvation f^om experiencing domestic violence and extramarital affair, are different t^om the normal civil contract. However, marital status agreements that have been based on gender inequalities could give rise to intricate problems in actuality. Therefore, it is not through agreements but legislation, public policy as well as appropriate institutional arrangement that fights of women who have been violated can be truly protected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200