我国《刑法》第13条但书规定新解——兼论但书在犯罪构成理论中的展开  

Of Proviso Clause in Criminal Law Is Not Quota Factor

作　　者：王强[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2011年第5期86-95,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：江苏省2011年度普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目:"中国刑法犯罪构成的定量因素研究"(CX22110836)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：规范刑法学的范畴内,遵循司法刑法学的逻辑要求,作为犯罪司法概念的《刑法》第13条,应该是形式和实质相结合的犯罪概念,前段是体现形式理性的刑事违法性的积极、类型化判断,而但书则是体现实质理性的社会危害性消极、个别化判断。因此,但书不仅仅是轻微违法的阻却事由,而且应当包含相当于三阶层体系中阻却构成要件符合性、阻却违法和阻却责任的全部内容。To explain the clause of criminal law,we must follow the judicature logic construction of criminal law to reinterpret Article 13 of the Criminal Law,which is just a criminal judicature concept and has the content of form and substantiality.The logical center of Article 13＇s first half is about criminal illegality,which manifests the form rationality,and it is a positive,general judgment.And the proviso of Article 13 is about social harmfulness,which manifests the substantive rationality,it is a negative,individualized judgment to negate crime.The proviso clause should summarize all matters which negate the concerning crimes,not only slight illegal （quota factor）,but also justified acts and expectant possibility （Zumutbarkeit）.

关 键 词：但书 定量因素 犯罪概念 犯罪构成 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]