检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵红梅[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2011年第5期183-190,共8页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(09YJA820085)
摘 要:以大陆法系划分公法与私法的观念来看,国内外原有的惩罚性赔偿实为私法社会化属性的责任。近年来,美国、德国惩罚性赔偿制度有了新的发展动向,出现了新型惩罚性赔偿即集体公益罚金形态,它注重直接保护消费者等集体公益,已不再为私法社会化属性的责任。正在进行的我国《消费者权益保护法》修订可从中得到重要启示。From the idea of division of public law and private law in civil law,the original punitive damages is a kind of responsibility with the nature of socialized private law in domestic and international field.In recent years,the punitive damages system in American and Germany poses a new trend:a new kind of punitive damages,i.e.,the fine for the sake of collective welfare,emerges,which stresses the importance of the protecting consumers' collective welfare,and does not belong to a part of the responsibility of socialized private law already.More reference should be made to the new trend in US and Germany in the future revision of Consumers' Rights and Interests Protecting Law of PRC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63