检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭景玉[1] 张云林[1] 贺先奇[1] 王京秋[1] 何柳[1] 秦婷[1]
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2011年第18期3497-3498,共2页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
摘 要:目的:探讨金标法和免疫发光法检测CEA在健康体检中的应用价值。方法:对728例健康体检的个人同时应用金标法和免疫发光法测定CEA,对结果进行分析。结果:金标法测定的阳性率为0.69%,免疫发光法测定的阳性率为0.41%,两者具有高度一致性。结论:对健康体检人群应先用金标法进行定性,对阳性结果再用免疫发光法进行定量。Objective: To investigate the clinic value of using dot immunogold chromatographic assay and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay to detect CEA in physical examination. Methods: Dot immunogold chromatographic assay and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay were used to detect CEA in 728 patients and the results were compared. Results: There were 5 positive cases (0.69%) in dot immunogold chromatographic assay and 3 positive cases (0.41%) in fluorescence enzyme immunoassay, which showed a high agreement. Conclusion: In the physical examination , CEA should be qualitatively detected by dot immunogold chromatographic assay and then the positive cases were quantitatively detected by dot immunogold chromatographic assay.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166