检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海奉贤区动物卫生监督所,上海201400 [2]苏州大学技术转化中心,苏州,215123
出 处:《国际医学寄生虫病杂志》2011年第5期273-276,共4页International JOurnal of Medical Parasitic Diseases
摘 要:目的比较3种孵化法检测牛血吸虫病的效果。方法将野外收集的血吸虫病阳性牛粪和实验室人工定量掺入虫卵的牛粪,分别用粪便铜丝筛淘洗尼龙兜过滤孵化法(常规法)、快速粪便毛蚴孵化法(快速法)、粪便双层尼龙兜淘洗孵化法(双层法)做病原学检测。结果快速法毛蚴相对孵出率为100%,而常规法为40.00%一81.86%,双层法为27.00%一63.16%。双层法的检出率最低,常规法和双层法差异无统计学意义。结论快速法可代替常规法用于牛血吸虫病的病原学检测。Objective To compare the effects of 3 hatching methods in detecting schistosomiasis of cattle. Methods Feces from schistosomiasis positive cattle or artificial mixed with Schistosoma japonicum eggs were used to exam S. japonicum miracidium in stool for evaluating fast hatching test, routine hatching test and double nylon hatching test. Results The hatchability rate of S. japonicum miracidium in stool with fast hatching test was 100% and that with the routine hatching test was 40.00% -81.86%, while with the double nylon hatching test was 27.00%-63.16%, respectively. Conclusion Fast hatching test is simpler and faster for examination of cattle schistosomiasis.
分 类 号:R383.24[医药卫生—医学寄生虫学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249