检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《电力建设》2011年第10期18-22,共5页Electric Power Construction
摘 要:同塔四回输电线路随着线路回数的增加,铁塔高度和横担宽度较单回线增加明显,杆塔塔型对线路的耐雷水平有较大的影响。为了正确评估500kV同塔四回线路横塔和竖塔的耐雷水平,采用改进电气几何模型(electric geometry method,EGM)与电磁暂态程序(elector-magnetic transient program,EMTP),对比了2种杆塔在不同的地面倾角以及杆塔接地电阻下的耐雷性能,对三避雷线与单耦合地线的防雷效果进行了研究。计算结果表明,横塔的耐雷性能明显优于竖塔,建议在雷害严重地区或是山区采用横塔,在线路走廊紧张地区采用竖塔。With the increment of circuit number in the transmission lines with four-circuit on a tower, the height and width of tower would increase obviously, which could largely influence the lightning withstand performance of the line. In order to accurately assess the lightning withstand performance of both horizontal and vertical tower, the improved electric geometry method (EGM)model and elector-magnetic transient program (EMTP)are applied to calculate the lightning withstand performance of the two tower type under different ground dip angel and grounding resistance. The results show that the lightning performance of horizontal tower is much better than the vertical one. Therefore, it is highly recommended that horizontal tower be applied in mountain area or serious lightning area, while the vertical tower be applied in the area where the line corridor is scarce.
分 类 号:TM86[电气工程—高电压与绝缘技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15