检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710061 [2]诺丁汉大学当代中国学学院
出 处:《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第5期68-73,共6页Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(10BJL023);教育部人文社科基金项目(09XJA790009)
摘 要:随着中央政府对农民工城市化在整体上由限制转入鼓励以来,各地方政府竞相推出了促进农民工城市化的个性方案。通过对农民工城市化宏观层面上整体判断,中观层面上体制制约因素,微观层面上农民工成本支付能力,以及地方政府激励相容性的阐析得出:成本支付是农民工城市化问题的核心,而在城乡统筹前提下的农民工自由选择权是关键。在农民工城市化的过程中,政府既不能缺位,也不能越位,不应该制定功利性的目标和政策。With the change of central government's attitude' to the migrant workers urbanization from limitation to encouragement, local governments have developed a lot of individualized proposals. This paper first analyzes the general judgement from the macroeconomic level perspective, the factors that constraint the migrant workers' urbanization in the current institutional system, the cost payment ability of migrant workers from the microeconomic level and the local government's incentive compatibility. It is concluded that the cost payment is the core of migrant worker's urbanization and the right of freed selection of migrant workers in the town and country context is the key factor. During the process of urbanization, the government should be neither vacant nor offside, and should not take the utilitarian policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.125.111