检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心 [2]中国人民大学社会学系
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第3期5-10,共6页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金项目“新生代农民工创业与城市适应研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:11BSH016
摘 要:文章尝试使用人口迁移的"推拉理论"作为分析框架,对新生代农民工这个巨大的人口迁移流进行解释。与第一代农民工相比,农村给予新生代农民工的"推力"依旧、"拉力"却越来越小;而城市给予他们的"拉力"和"推力"相比第一代农民工更大。在此基础上,我们提出"推拉"因素之中有一部分制度性因素是不合理的。户籍制度及城乡歧视造成的"推力"过大、资源过度集中于大城市导致"拉力"过大。要从根本上解决农民工的问题,我们提出两条思路,一方面,城乡户籍限制的放开是根本途径,但先决条件是解决大城市"拉力"过大的问题;另一方面,大城市的"人口退出机制"亟待建立。This article attempts to use "push and pull theory" as an analytical framework to explain the huge flow of new generation of migrant workers. Compared with the first generation of migrant workers, rural area still give the new genera- tion the"push" power but the "pull" power is getting smaller and smaller; the city give the new generation both more and more"pull" and "push" more than the first generation of migrant workers. On this basis, we propose the institutional factor among the "push and pull" causes is unreasonable. Urban and rural household registration system and the discrimination cause too much "push", and the excessive concentration of resources in large cities led to too much "pull" as well. To fun- damentally solve the problems of migrant workers, we propose two solutions: on the one hand, liberalization of restrictions on rural-urban residence is a fundamental way, but the prerequisite is to solve the problem of the huge city about the too much "pull"; on the other hand, the "population exit mechanism" of the huge city is urgently needed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15