检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李岭梅[1]
出 处:《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2011年第3期100-102,共3页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
摘 要:中国法制史的研究目前亟待解决的问题之一就是研究对象的范围的确定问题。中国法制史的研究对象范围不应当仅仅局限在法律制度史领域内,政治制度、经济制度、教育制度、救灾制度等强制性规则体系的发展历史也应当纳入中国法制史的研究视野之内。此外,由于中国法制史和中国法律思想史、中国法学史存在一定的交叉,所以在研究中国法制史时,还有必要关注中国法律思想史和中国法学史。In terms of the studies on Chinese legal system history,one of problems to be solved urgently is to determine the limits of the object of the study.And different people have different views on it.The author selectively introduced some main points on the limits of the objective of study of Chinese legal system history.At the same time it is proposed in this article that the objects of study of the Chinese legal system history cannot be limited only in the history of legal system,but in some developing histories of compulsory rule systems such as political system,economic system,educational system,and disaster relief system etc.In addition,due to the cross of the various histories,it is necessary that Chinese legal thought history and the law history be focused on while Chinese legal system history is being studied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3