德莫林及美皮康联合氧疗对压疮的治疗效果  

Effects of Dermlin and Mepilex Border combined with oxygen therapy on bedsore

作　　者：朱连荣[1] 黄英[1] 王晓媛[1] 翟冰[1] 李谦[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军总医院南楼血液科,北京100853

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第27期3318-3320,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的探讨德莫林及美皮康联合氧疗对压疮的疗效。方法将60例由于各种原因所致压疮的老年血液肿瘤病患者随机分成两组，观察组30例，采用德莫林及美皮康联合氧疗的方法治疗处理；对照组30例，采用定时红外线灯照射及常规外科方法处理。比较两组治疗后压疮的恢复情况。结果观察组压疮的有效率为100％明显高于对照组60％，差异有统计学意义（x^2=17．78，P〈0．01），两组患者瑚压疮的治愈时间以及换药次数比较，差异有统计学意义[（11．4±1．13）h比（3．9±1．13）h，（21．2±1．39）次比（2．8±0．71）分；t分别为3．403，3．411；P〈0.01]。结论德莫林及美皮康联合氧疗的方法对各种原因引起的压疮有良好的治疗效果。Objective To evaluate the effects of Dermlin and Mepilex Border combined with oxygen therapy on bedsore. Methods 60 neoplastic hematologic disorder patients suffering from bedsores arising from various causes were randomly divided into observational group （n = 30） and control group （n = 30 ）. The former group was treated by Dermlin and Mepilex Border combined with oxygen therapy, the latter one was treated by timing irradiation of infrared lamp and routine surgical methods. The recovery conditions of bedsores were observed. Results The effective rate of the observational group was significantly higher than those of the control group [ （ 100% vs 60% ） ;x^2 = 17.78 ,P 〈0.01 ]. There were significant differences in healing time and times of dressing change between both groups [ （ 11.4 ± 1.13 ） h vs （3.9 ± 1.13 ） h, （21.2 ± 1.39） vs （2.8± 0.71 ） ; t = 3. 403,3.411 ; P 〈0. 01 ]. Conclusions Dermlin and Mepilex Border combined with oxygen therapy has satisfactory effects on treating bedsores arising from various causes.

关 键 词：压力性溃疡 老年患者 德莫林喷雾剂 美皮康 氧疗 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]