关于侵权诉因排除提单管辖权条款适用的反思——以无单放货案件的处理为视角  

Reconsideration of non-application of the jurisdiction clause based on infringement cases of bill of lading——from the perspective of the cases of delivery of cargo without bill of lading

作　　者：蔡福军[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门海事法院,福建厦门361009

出　　处：《中国海商法年刊》2011年第3期116-120,共5页Annual of China Maritime Law

摘　　要：提单的管辖权是正确处理无单放货等提单纠纷的首要问题。提单的管辖权条款属于协议管辖,是国际私法中"当事人意思自治原则"的产物。无单放货案件存在违约责任与侵权责任竞合的情形,所谓的"侵权纠纷一般不适用协议管辖条款"的规则并不能当然适用。根据现行法以及民事侵权的基本法理,分析中国法院用于否定提单管辖权条款适用的"侵权诉因"及"与争议没有实际联系"两个主要事由,认为以"侵权诉因"排除提单管辖权条款适用的做法不仅于法无据,而且违背法理;而以"与争议没有实际联系"作为否定承运人总部或主营业地之管辖连接点的理由也过于极端。在上述批评的基础上,提出解决提单管辖权条款问题的三点策略。The jurisdiction is the initial issue of cases of bill of lading, and the jurisdiction clause means the parties＇ agreement on their own free will. A dispute arises over bill of lading, such as delivery of goods without bill of lading, usually exists a breach of contract matching with infringement of rights, and in which the rule of so-called ＂an action brought in respect of infringement rules out agreement of the jurisdiction＇should generally be disobeyed. This text analyzes the two negative reasons, i.e. the above-mentioned rule and ＂non-genuine link with the dispute＂, which mainly concerning non-application of the jurisdiction clause of bill of lading in judicial practice, and then submits 3 points of proposals to help problem solved.

关 键 词：提单管辖权 民事审判 侵权 无单放货 

分 类 号：F740.44[经济管理—国际贸易]