检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘昌强[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《河北法学》2011年第11期21-28,共8页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:在检察委员会的规范化建设已取得明显成效的情况下,应当更多地关注检察委员会的司法属性问题和决策机制的改革完善。检察委员会改革应遵循司法规律,将民主、高效、权威设定为基本目标,通过优化组织体系、改革决策模式、建立责任机制、提升委员司法能力等强化其司法属性。在决策模式改革上,应借鉴吸纳审判合议制和党委票决制的合理内核,保证委员的"民主"地位、严格检察长的"集中"机制,确立一级检察委员会定案机制,以此增强检察委员会决策机制的司法属性。As the normalizational construction of the procuratorial committee has presented some remarkable effect, the judicial features and the reform of the decision-making system of the procuratorial committee is demanded to be paid more attention. Adhering to the rules of justice, setting democracy, efficency and authority as the fundamental goals, the reform is suggested to be carried on in series of ways such as advancing the system, regulating the mode, establishing the liability mechanism and evaluating the professionalism. In this paper, the reform of the mode is proposed to draw on the experience of the collegiate system of judge and the decision-making mode of the party, to ensure the democracy of the procuratorial committee members, to strict the power of the chief procurator, to establish the decision machanism of the procuratorial committee, and to enhance the judicial features of the procuratorial committee.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40