中药知识产权国际化保护问题解决方法论初探  

Preliminary Study on Solving Method of Chinese Traditional Medicine Intelligent Property Internationalization Protection

作　　者：张冬[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学人文学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第11期36-43,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题<传统医药产业创新问题的知识产权研究>[CLS(2011)D42];国家软科学研究计划<传统医药产业资源知识产权保护的法律风险研究>(2010GXS5D201);黑龙江省自然科学基金面上项目<黑龙江资源产业科技创新的知识产权风险研究>(G201019)

摘　　要：新技术竞争时代,中国的国际化进程离不开传统优势产业知识产权的最佳保护。方法论是提供最终解决方案的前提,所以在强弱保护的利益博弈及国际公约的履行谈判过程中,如何探寻一种被国内外理论和实践印证科学的法学方法论,凸显紧迫和重大。研究发现,实效主义法学及其博弈均衡分析工具试图基于经济学原理立足法理学的视角,从实效结果推测解决方案,它为中药国际化问题的解决应以国家利益最大化为核心提供了一定的逻辑依据。同时,中药国际化问题基本适合实效方法论的重要工具博弈均衡理论应用的条件。由此,我们认识到博弈兴邦理论不失为解决中药国际化问题理性利己的科学选择。In the era of new technique competition, to realize internationalization, China has paid more attention to the research of how to protect traditional advantage industry intelligent property on a best way. Absolutely, a reasonable methodology is a premise of a best solution. So on the process of development of international benefit games involving strong or weak protection and international convention negotiation and enforcement, it seems urgent and important how to explore a best method which corroborated and admitted by both domestic and international in the theory and practice. The research has found that the Pragmaticism law doctrine and its analytical tool-game theory came from economics principle, and do research focused on jurisprudence. It has provided with a kind of logic basis to the argument that national interests are the key aims for Chinese traditional medicine development. In the meanwhile, the issue of Chinese traditional medicine internationalization settlement is basically suitable for the exercising conditions of Pragmaticism Methodology＇s tool-Game Balanced Theory. Accordingly, the above theory seems to be a scientific choice for the settlement of Chinese traditional medicine internationalization dominated strategy.

关 键 词：中药知识产权保护 实效法学方法论探究 博弈均衡 国际竞争利益最大化 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]