论双边投资条约中的不排除措施条款——以ICSID专门委员会撤销Sempra案与Enron案裁决为视角  

A Study on the Non-Precluded Measures under Bilateral Investment Treaties: On Sempra and Enron Annulment Decisions from ICSID Committee

作　　者：梁丹妮[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第5期146-152,共7页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目青年基金(11YJC820064);中山大学人文社科青年基金项目(12000-3171913)

摘　　要：2010年I,CSID专门委员会先后撤销了Sempra案、Enron案的裁决,围绕《美阿BIT》第11条的解释与适用、及其与危急情况之习惯国际法的关系,国际社会展开了激烈讨论。在肯定作为BIT安全阀条款之一的"不排除措施条款"是仲裁庭审理案件应适用的准据法,其适用顺序应优先于危急情况之习惯国际法规则的基础上,结合目前国际社会对BIT中东道国根本安全利益与外国投资者利益冲突与协调的热议,提出中国对外缔结BIT时应慎重考虑"不排除措施条款"。The recent annulments of two ICSID arbitral awards in Sempra v.Argentina and Enron v.Argentina in 2010 have aroused the spirited argument among the international society,which focus on the interpretation and application of Article XI under Argentina-U.S.BIT,and its relationship with the rule of Necessity under customary international law.It should be defined that the Non-Precluded Measure Clause under BIT,as the safeguards of host countries is the applicable law that the tribunal should apply,which is prior to the rule of Necessity under customary international law in the investor-state arbitration.On the debate of the controversy and harmony of the essential security of host countries and the benefits of foreign investors worldwide,China should concern about the Non-Precluded Measure Clause in conclusion of BIT prudentially.

关 键 词：双边投资条约 不排除措施条款 危急情况 习惯国际法 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]