检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王世清
出 处:《中医学报》2011年第10期1215-1216,共2页Acta Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较高效液相色谱法(HPLC)与薄层色谱扫描法(HPTLC)测定六味地黄丸(浓缩丸)中熊果酸含量结果的差别。方法:采用HPLC法、HPTLC法对六味地黄丸(浓缩丸)的同一供试品溶液进行熊果酸含量测定。结果:两种方法测得的结果基本接近。但HPTLC法的两份间偏差较大,且重复性较差。结论:HPLC法的精密度明显高于HPTLC法。Objective:To compare the difference of ursolic acid contents in liuwei dihuang Pill(concentrated pill) determined by high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) and thin layer chromatography(TLC) scanning.Methods:HPLC and HPTLC were adopted to determine the content of ursolic acid in test sample solution of liuwei dihuang pill(concentrated pill).Results:The results measured by two methods were almost approximate,but the deviation between two samples determined by HPTLC was larger and the repeatability was worse.Conclusion:The precision of HPLC is conspicuously higher than that of HPTLC.
关 键 词:六味地黄丸(浓缩丸) 熊果酸 高效液相色谱法 薄层色谱法
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248