“都”字关系结构中中心语的宽域解读及相关问题  

On the wide-scope interpretation of the head NP in dou relativized constructions and some related issues

作　　者：黄瓒辉[1] 石定栩[2] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学 [2]香港理工大学

出　　处：《当代语言学》2011年第4期304-320,379,共17页Contemporary Linguistics

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"现代汉语事件量化系统的研究"(项目编号:06CYY013);香港理工大学科研基金项目"Adverb Quantification in Mandarin Chinese and its Diachronic Development"(现代汉语副词量化及其历时发展;项目编号:G-YX73)的资助

摘　　要：对于"都"字关系结构中中心语的宽域解读现象,以往文献或只是描述现象,或仅从成分统制结构关系角度做出简单解释。本文充分讨论了"都"字关系结构中中心语总是作宽域解读这一语言事实,并对这一现象重新做出了解释。本文坚持话题化是关系化的先导这一观点,认为"都"字关系结构都是对相应的"都"字话题结构中话题成分的关系化,因而中心语继承了后者话题成分作宽域解读的辖域特点;而对于看似不能被这一解释覆盖的"每……的……"结构,本文认为可以看作是领属结构而非关系结构,而"每"的全称量化功能在领属结构中得以传递,因而使得整个结构具有跟"每+CL+NP"同样的分布要求。This paper offers an alternative explanation for the fact that the head NP in dou(都) relativized constructions like Mei ge xuesheng dou xuanzhong de wenzhang(每个学生都选中的文章) obligatorily takes a wide scope over other Q-NPs in the relative clause.Based on the derivation relation between topicalization and relativization,the paper argues that the obligatory wide-scope reading of the head NP in dou relativized constructions comes from the wide-scope reading of the topic in corresponding topicalized constructions.The wide-scope reading of the head NP of dou relativized constructions is a preservation of the wide-scope reading of the topic of the corresponding topicalized construction,since the head NP is the result of relativizing the topic.For mei(每)-constructions without dou like Mei ge xuesheng xuanzhong de wenzhang(每个学生选中的文章),which seemingly constitutes an exception for our claim,the paper argues that they can be viewed as possessive constructions rather than relativized ones.

关 键 词：“都”关系结构 中心语 辖域“每” 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]