检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尤育号[1]
出 处:《史学理论研究》2011年第4期99-109,160,共11页Historiography Bimonthly
摘 要:自20世纪40年代以来,对中国近代士绅阶层的研究,大体经历了从"绅士论"、"乡绅论"到"地方精英论"、"士绅论"的历程。中外学者在士绅的构成与分层、士绅阶层的社会流动与转型、士绅与近代社会转型、区域士绅研究等领域的学术成果等方面,不仅回答和阐释了近代士绅阶层的相关问题,对中国近代社会史研究亦有不小的贡献。然以学术研究的创新性论之,近代士绅研究领域仍有相当大的学术空间可以拓展。Since the 1940s,the research for the modern gentry in China has undergone the course from'Gentleman Theory','Squire Theory'to'Local Elite Theory'and'Gentry Theory '.Scholars at home and abroad have achieved the academic success in these fields,such as the composition and delamination of the gentry,the social mobility and transformation of the gentry class,the transformation of the gentry and modern society and the regional gentry research,which not only answers and explains the related issues of modern gentry,but also has great contribution to the study of Chinese Modern Social History.However,as for the innovation in academic research,the field in modern gentry research is still considered with large academic space.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28