检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭国平[1]
出 处:《商业经济》2011年第20期28-31,123,共5页Business & Economy
摘 要:通过分析当今几个最主要发达国家在它们各自发展阶段所采用的贸易保护方式的历史,来质疑当今发达国家鼓吹贸易自由化能有效促进发展中国家经济增长的观点,得出结论:发达国家的成功并不是建立在学术理论和经济政策上所倡导的贸易自由化,而是基于幼稚产业保护的技术性竞赛;发展是个复杂的过程,贸易自由化不应该在缺乏实证检验下被高度概括为适应所有经济体成功的条件;发达国家不应该限制发展中国家自由使用它们在发展阶段曾经使用过的贸易政策,而应该尊重它们的选择。It questions the view that the trade liberalization the developed countries preach can promote effectively the economic growth of developing countries,by analyzing the history that several main developed countries adopted the trade protection in their stage of development,and it draws the conlusion: the success of developed countries is based on the technical competition on account of protecting infant industry,instead of the trade liberalizatrion proposed on academics and economic policy;development is a complex process and the trade liberalization shouldn't be highly gereralized as an condition of success to suit all economis,in the absence of empirical tests;the developed countries shouldn't restrict the developing countries' free use of trade policy that they once had adopted in their developing stage and they should respect the developing countries' choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51