财产权的构成、限制及其合宪性  

Composition and Restriction of Ownership of Property and Its Constitutionality

作　　者：汪进元[1] 高新平[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第5期18-25,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：司法部重点项目<国家人权行动计划实施的保障性研究>(项目编号:9SFB1003)

摘　　要：传统意义的财产权包括有体物(动产和不动产)和无体物(债权、知识产权、有价证券)等,以及对财产的占有、使用、收益、处分或支配等各项权能;现代意义的财产权还包括个人公法财产权。基于财产权的制度性保障理念,各国宪法都授权立法机关制定法律,以形成财产内容,限制财产的存续状态和使用收益等。财产权限制之法律的合宪性基准,包括财产内容的形成应该尊重立法裁量、私有财产之限制不得忽视意识自治、公法财产之限制不得影响生存保障、出现征收与限制两可时注重财产价值补偿。Ownership of property in traditional sense includes physical objects（movable and immovable property）,non-physical objects（claims,intellectual property and securities）,the rights of possession,use,and disposal and the right to earnings;ownership of property in modern sense also includes ownership of personal property in public law.Based on the institutional guarantee idea of ownership of property,constitutions in various countries have authorized the legislature to formulate laws,leading to the formation of property content and the restriction of the existent status of property and the use of proceeds.The restriction of ownership of property,namely legal constitutionality basis,shall abide by the following principles：firstly,the formation of property content shall respect legislative discretion;secondly,the restriction of ownership of personal property shall not neglect the awareness self-governance;thirdly,the restriction of property in public law shall not affect survival guarantee;fourthly,the compensation for property values shall be emphasized when the expropriation of property and the restriction of property do not differ.

关 键 词：财产权 构成范围 限制方式 合宪基准 

分 类 号：D912.7[政治法律—法学]