中国散文文体的近现代嬗变  

The Evolution of Chinese Prose Style

作　　者：陈剑晖[1] 杨汤琛[2] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学文学院,教授博导广州510631 [2]华南农业大学中文系,讲师博士广州510642

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2011年第10期124-130,共7页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目"中国现代散文文体形态研究"(09YJA751030)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：中国古代散文家从魏晋南北朝起便有着比较自觉的文体意识。这种文体自觉主要体现在两个方面:一是散骈并用;二是诗文互渗。中国散文文体裂变的先兆发端于晚清域外游记,但过去的文学史家只关注重大的事件、外在的口号之于散文文体变革的意义,却忽视了可能引起文体裂变的那些处于萌芽状态、混沌一片,因而是更曲折潜在的隐性因素。文章还考察了梁启超的"新文体",指出"新文体"散文仍属于旧文学的范畴。一方面,梁启超将我国"杂文学"传统的优势和缺点发挥到极致;另方面,他启迪了中国散文的新变,促成了现代散文格局的重构。From Wei,Jin and the Southern and Northern Dynasties,ancient Chinese prose writers were aware of prose style.This consciousness embodied mainly in two aspects： Firstly,emanation and parallel were both used.Secondly,prose and article permeated mutually.The evolution of Chinese prose style originated from overseas travel notes which were written in the late Qing Dynasty,however,the past literary historians only focused on the significance of major events and external slogans,and they neglected the invisible factors which were still unclear,just like buds while existed twist and turn.The paper also investigates Liang Qichao＇s ＂New Style of Prose＂,and points out that his ＂new style of prose＂ still belongs to the category of the old literature.On one hand,Liang Qichao developed the advantages and disadvantages of traditional ＂essays＂ to its acme;on the other hand,he enlightened the new changes of Chinese prose and contributed the reconstruction of the pattern of modern prose.

关 键 词：中国散文 文体 近现代 嬗变 

分 类 号：I207.609[文学—中国文学]