商法上的善意取得制度研究——比较法的启示与中国法的完善  

On the Good Faith Acquisition in Commercial Law——The Revelation of Comparative Law and the Improvement of Chinese Law

作　　者：曾大鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《时代法学》2011年第5期75-84,共10页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：上海市第三期重点学科(S30902);2010年度华东政法大学科学研究项目(10HZK019)的成果之一

摘　　要：在商法善意取得制度的法律构成上,虽然德国以对处分权的善意为主,日本以有价证券的善意取得为主,英国以公开市场原则为主,美国以禁反言原则为主,但是各国制度实质上殊途同归,均旨在维护商事交易动的安全。我国立法采取民商合一的模式,因欠缺对善意取得制度在商法上独特价值的理性认识,同时陷入了"商法化过度"与"商法化不足"的双重困境。我国宜从商法的角度,梳理和完善《物权法》、《合同法》、《票据法》、《海商法》及《信托法》的相关规则,从而保证形式合理性与实质合理性之契合,并充分尊重商法善意取得制度的相对独立性。As to the constitutes of good faith acquisition in commercial law, although the Ger- man is based on the good faith of disposition, the Japan based on the good faith acquisition of securities, the UK based on the rule of market overt and the U. S. based on the principle of estoppel, they similarly aim to safeguard the dynamic safety of commercial transactions. Chinese legislation in- tegrates the civil and commercial rules, without a rational understanding of the unique value of good faith acquisition in commercial law, and then causes double problems ＂the excessive commercializa- tion＂ and ＂the lack of commercialization＂. In the perspective of commercial law, it is advisable to organize and improve Chinese Property Law, Contract Law, Negotiable Instruments Law, Maritime Law and Trust Law, etc. , to accord the formal rationality with the substantive rationality and esteem the relative independence of good faith acquisition in commercial law.

关 键 词：商事交易安全 实质商法主义 善意取得 完善 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]