国际投资仲裁中的精神损害赔偿研究  

Moral Damages Awarded in International Investment Arbitration

作　　者：朱明新[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《现代法学》2011年第5期121-131,共11页Modern Law Science

基　　金：2009年国家社科基金重大项目"促进与保护我国海外投资的法律体制研究"(09&ZD032)

摘　　要：国际公法领域的精神损害赔偿具有悠久历史,但在国际投资法领域,精神损害赔偿则是一个新兴话题。鉴于投资条约的特殊建构,投资者固为投资者-国家仲裁体制中的申诉者,因此,申诉者成为国际投资仲裁中精神损害赔偿请求的最常见主体。但这并不意味着,固为被申诉方的国家没有寻求精神损害赔偿的可能性。晚近以来的国际投资仲裁实践均表明,这两种类型的精神损害赔偿均有发生的可能,为此,有必要结合已有案例,研究国际投资仲裁中精神损害赔偿的合法依据,并在此基础上对相关未决问题进行尝试性解释。Being a hoary tradition in public international law, to award moral damages seems still a new topic in the field of international investment law. Given the special structure of investment treaties, in the in- vestor-state arbitration framework, the investor is invariably the claimant seeking for moral damages while the state is the respondent. However, it does not mean that the respondent state has no chance to claim for moral damages. The recent international investment arbitration cases have shown it is a fact that both the investor and the state are likely to claim for moral damages and try our best to solve relevant problems. Thus, it is necessary for us to improve the research in this area

关 键 词：国际投资仲裁 精神损害 赔偿 DLP案 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]