检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院急危重症医学科,上海崇明202150 [2]上海杨浦区中心医院急救中心,上海杨浦200090
出 处:《中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版)》2011年第5期13-17,23,共6页Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的评价门诊口服抗感染药物治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的临床疗效。方法以某呼吸科专家门诊收治的CAP患者32例为研究对象,依据高、低危人群前瞻性应用5种口服抗感染药物治疗(红霉素、国产或进口克拉霉素、联合二代头孢、莫西沙星),随访并评价疗效。结果 32例患者采用不同治疗方案中7d总有效率(好转+治愈),7d好转(有效/显效)率为68.8%(22例),临床治愈率为31.2%10例(10例),总有效率(好转+治愈)为100%(32例);14d治愈率为59.4%(19例),21d治愈率为9.4%(3例)。结论口服大环内酯类抗生素(红霉素、克拉霉素)或莫西沙星经验性抗感染治疗CAP疗效确切而可靠。Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy orally for outpatient with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Method Patients with CAP in a respiratory specialist outpatient were treated by several programs of empirical antimicrobial therapy (erythromycin, homemade or income clarithromycin/Clarit, combining second generation of cephalosporins and moxifloxacin) orally prospectively according to high or low risk groups. Totally there were 32 cases of patients. Their clinical data were collected to evaluate and compare their efficacy. Results Their 7d improved rate was 73.7% (14/19 cases) and cured rate 21.1% (4/19 cases). For several programs total effective rate of improved was 68.8% (22/32 cases)and cured rate was 31.2% ( 10/32 cases) during 7 days (7 d) , cured rate was 59.4% (19/32 cases) during 14 days (14d) and 9.4% (3/32 cases) during 21 days (21d). Conclusion The clinical efficacy by received antibiotics of erythromycin, maerolide or moxifloxaein orally is good enough for outpatient with CAP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198