检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100083 [2]北京市中伦律师事务所,北京100022
出 处:《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第3期70-76,共7页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社科一般项目"我国执行救济制度的缺陷及完善"(项目批准号:09YJA820091)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:债务人异议之诉是民事诉讼法理论中民事执行救济制度的重要组成部分,也是民事执行救济研究的重要课题。在实务层面,债务人异议之诉也已经为众多大陆法系国家的立法所确立。尽管我国于2007年对民事诉讼法进行了若干修改,但依然没有设立用以保护债务人实体权利的债务人异议之诉。本文从理论分析入手,结合国外债务人异议之诉的实务现状,进而阐述我国建立债务人异议之诉的必要性及可行性,以求为我国债务人异议之诉的深入研究和实务构建提供些许思考。The debtor dissidence action constitutes an integral part of the civil enforcement remedy regime in the civil procedure law system and is a significant topic in relation thereto.In legal practice,the debtor dissidence action has been widely established in many civil law countries.With regard to China,though several amends have been made to the Civil Procedure Law since 2007,the debtor dissidence action is still not expressly stipulated.This paper,starting from the analysis of the theory and the current status of the debtor dissidence action,discusses the necessity and feasibility of establishing the system in China in order to provide any inspiration for the further study and practice of the debtor dissidence action.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69