论过失相抵原则在严格责任中的适用——侵权责任法相关法律条文解析  

Probing the Application of Contributory Negligence in Strict Liability:Analysis and Review of Relevant Articles of Tort Liability Law

作　　者：涂卫[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第5期44-47,共4页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：立法本意在于公平分担责任的"过失相抵"原则是损害赔偿责任的一般调整原则,同样应适用于严格责任。我国关于过失相抵适用于严格责任的立法和司法实践分为基本不适用、有条件适用以及明确规范适用三个阶段。出台不久的《侵权责任法》既有关于过失相抵的一般规定,也有在严格责任领域适用的特殊规定。在新的侵权责任法背景下,如何在严格责任中适用过失相抵原则产生了以下两大新问题,需要进行解读。即如何处理《侵权责任法》关于过失相抵的一般规定与其在严格责任领域适用的特殊规定之间的关系以及在新旧法律规定不同的情况下严格责任领域适用过失相抵应当如何限制。Contributory negligence principle, the original intention of which lies in fair assumed liability, as a general principle in damage liability, also applies in strict liability. Legislature and judicial practice of the application of contributory negligence in strict liability in China includes three stages which are universal non-application, conditional application and regulated application. Tort Liability Law has general provisions relating contributory negligence and also special provisions relating that in strict liability. In such a new circumstance, two new problems have appeared in application of contributory negligence in strict liability. One is how to deal with the relationship between general provisions about contributory negligence and special provisions about that in strict liability. The other is how to limit the application of contributory negligence in strict liability when the new legislation differs from the old ones.

关 键 词：过失相抵 严格责任 损害赔偿 侵权责任法 

分 类 号：D923.7[政治法律—民商法学]