明确性原则视野下刑法前科报告制度之检讨与完善——兼评《刑法修正案(八)》对刑法第一百条的修改  

On the Amendment of the Article 100 in Chinese Criminal Code

作　　者：高仕银[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第4期25-30,共6页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：刑法第一百条在结构和内涵上都存在着诸多缺陷与不足,其与罪刑法定明确性原则的要求存在很大差距。《刑法修正案(八)》虽对本条进行了修改,但并不彻底,是一个"半截子的革命"。通过对本条内涵的解构分析,从对前科报告者的人格尊重和人权保护的价值立场出发,前科报告的时间应为入伍或就业成功以后,确立不报告和不实报告的后果,旨在更好地实现前科报告和对有前科者及相关单位的保护。There are some defects and shortcomings both in structure and meaning in the article 100 and it can＇t meet the requirement of the principles of definitude.The eighth amendment for the criminal code has added a paragraph to better the article,but it is not enough.To better this article totally,the personality and rights of the person with criminal record should be fully respected and protected.After being enrolled in the force or employed,the person with criminal record must report which he/she has been punished before.If the person doesn＇t give a real report,his/her qualification of being a solider or worker should be deprived.

关 键 词：明确性原则 刑法第一百条 前科报告制度 报告时间 后果 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]