基于参与式方法的农牧户生计现状评估--以内蒙古太仆寺旗为例  

Livelihood status assessment of farmers and herdsmen’s households based on participatory appraisal: A case in Taipusi Banner of Inner Mongolia

作　　者：魏雯[1,2] 徐柱[2] 师尚礼[1] 田青松[2] 王慧萍 柳剑丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃农业大学草业学院,兰州730070 [2]中国农业科学院草原研究所,呼和浩特010010 [3]太仆寺旗草原工作站,内蒙古太仆寺旗027000

出　　处：《应用生态学报》2011年第10期2686-2692,共7页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

基　　金：中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(2010-Z-3);内蒙古太仆寺旗典型草原放牧管理优化模式研究项目(1610332011019);国家重点基础研究计划项目(2007CB106806)资助

摘　　要：运用参与式方法调查了内蒙古农牧交错区太仆寺旗不同类型农牧户的生计现状,分析了不同类型农牧户的生计策略、制约因素和提高途径.结果表明:纯农型家庭规模小,年龄结构偏大,整体文化水平低,生计策略单一,脆弱性和风险较大,引入非农生产活动是降低生计风险和提高生活水平的重要途径;纯牧型家庭以放牧为主要谋生方式,草场脆弱性对其生产活动影响很大,发展环境友好型高产农牧业是解决生计问题和环境问题的有效途径;农业兼业型和牧业兼业型家庭规模大,年龄结构轻,劳动力分工多样化,从事非农活动的比例较大,生活水平较好,尤以牧业兼业型家庭收入更高.Participatory appraisal method was adopted to investigate the recent livelihood status of different type farmers and herdsmen’s households in the Taipusi Banner of Inner Mongolia agriculture- animal husbandry ecotone, aimed to understand their livelihood strategies and restricting factors and to search for the ways to improve their living standards. The households dealing with pure agricultural production had smaller family size, with older age-structure and lower educational level, and their simple livelihood strategies brought about larger vulnerability and risk. To introduce and expand non-agricultural activities would be the important way to promote the livelihood diversification and to reduce the livelihood risks of these households. The households dealing with pure animal husbandry took grazing as the main subsistence, and their production activities were greatly restrained by the pasture vulnerability. To develop environment-friendly and high-yielding agriculture and animal husbandry would be the effective way to solve the livelihood problems of these households and to protect the ecological environment. The households dealing with both agricultural production and business or dealing with both animal husbandry and business generally had larger family size, with younger age- structure, higher diversity in labor division, larger proportion of non-farming activities, and better living standards. Especially for the households dealing with both animal husbandry and business, their income was much higher.

关 键 词：参与式评估 生计策略 农牧交错区 土地利用 

分 类 号：D422.7[政治法律—政治学]